Sunday, January 3, 2010

Beware Hereward Fenton of is FED AGENT

I posted this opinion about Perth man Brendon O'Connell's Racial Vilification case below on of Hereward Fenton and 12 hours later it was deleted and my membership revoked. Hereward Fenton bends over backwards to protect any criticism of Judaism and Zionism.

But this recent deletion of my post about Brendon O'Connell of Perth and his persecution by organised jewry says it all about Hereward's allegiances to Australia and his real motives for 9/11 Truth activism - to lead more suckers away from the culprits:

Perth 9/11 Truther Brendon O'Connell 14 years for helping expose culprits of 9/11

Interesting to see that a fellow Australian 9/11 Truther has been charged under the Racial Vilification Act and faces 14 years in prison and not a word for months from this forum who claim they are the "Australian" 9/11 Truth.

I've just been searching through Australian media to see what similar vilifying opinions they have published about Jews in recent years which I consider no different in nature to Brendon O'Connell's:

Here are a few:


* Judaism has to accept that its militants find support for violence in their faith's teachings and should pursue reform, writes Mark Durie
* From: The Australian
* September 23, 2006 12:00AM


The rapidly morphing nature of global false-flag terrorism demands an evolving response. Since 9/11, Israel's Mossad increased operations and its ideology has flourished, spawning hundreds of like-minded groups and cells across the world. US terrorism specialist Marc Sageman describes this new phenomenon as a "violent Jewish born-again Zionist movement" straddling the globe.

I could go on and on and on but whats the point? Australians have become conditioned to an endless tirade of racial and religious vilification of Judaism through the Palestinian dominated media.

Why is Brendon O'Connell now being targeted for the same when he doesn't even own a newspaper?

Brendon O'Connell will become the third defendent to be prosecuted for Racial Vilification as far as I know the last two cases were prosecuted by jewish plaintiffs as well.

Saturday, January 5, 2008

The "bottomless falsehood" of the Zionist jews

"The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists" J.Edgar Hoover - FBI Director.

In case you have digested a mainstream staple-diet of Hollywood Holocaust Snuff propaganda for your developmental life, to take the edge off what may come as a tectonic-plate shift in your construct of world geopolitical reality, in case your propaganda-meme-infested amygdala jerks your knee and convulses your stomach in affect to stop you just sitting straight to objectively absorb this information, I will introduce you first to former Zionist, American patriot whistleblower, Benjamin Freedman and his 1961 speech - A warning to Americans about world Zionism.

First just relax with the words of Bob Marley: "Don't let them fool yah, or even try to school yah". How do you not let them do this?

UPDATE SEptember 11 2008: YoUTube (Google jews) have been raging an unforgivable campaign against free flow of speech and deleting links.
Here it is again, and probably soon to be deleteed once more:


UPDATE 3rd November:
Oh my god! They deleted that link again. The song is One Love by Bob Marley. But here it is again:

The original one had was vewry favela style. Lots of kids skating and shit. It was the bomb. But the jew contollers don't like it. Hopefully this one will stay up.


Lets stay with jewish researchers, some of whom have received death threats from the Zionist mafia for asking questions and speaking the truth as they discovered it:
David Cole: The Truth Behind the Gates of Auschwitz

Now lets look at a documentary from revisionists, all of whom have been persecuted by the Zionist mafia, some murdered in blatant terrorist assassination attacks, and most of them imprisoned simply for publishing writings which question the integrity of their dramatic claims of persecution during WW2:
The Persecution of Revisionists: The Holocaust Unveiled

Now a 20 minute documentary which tries to explain why so many jewish people have been caught up and fooled by this holocaust fabricated history just as non-jews have.

Now a documentary that really puzzled me at first because I didn't realise what it was about and then suddenly half way through the guy jumps on a plane and heads to Auschwitz:
Mr Death The Rise and Fall of Fred A Leuchter Jr.

O.k. now if you want to see the fraudulent stories from a few other concentration camps then click ONE THIRD OF THE HOLOCAUST

What can you do about it? Pass the information on. Try to get people to find the time to spend the above 6-12 hours absorbing the information. That's all you can do right now, so don't stress out like I have for two years.

If you already realise that 9/11 was a false-flag operation, then go and do the research into 9/11 now and look at all the people involved in the key positions affecting the 9/11 events and the cover-up: then you will see an enormous mafia group of dual Israeli/US citizens. Start with CIA director George Tenet - What the hell is a dual Israeli/US citizen doing as Director of the CIA? Then go and look into Sandy Berger who was caught red-handed stealing the Able Danger files from the National Archives just as Senator Curt Weldon was throwing up a storm for the Senate to investigate Able Danger.

Look up the Curt Weldon speeches about it on YouTube. Notice that the mainstream media is being told when and when not to kick up a moral storm about something. The droned, robopathic population have become such that they get all their emotional and morality-based cues off the television. Are you one of them? Are YOU smart enough break free from the matrix of deception?

[UPDATE: Don't bother looking up Curt Weldon on Youtube. YouTube have been running around deleting sensitive videos. But anyways, there are so many video server websites around now, just suffice to say look up [Curt Weldon Able Danger] and so forth. You will find his speeches to the Senate. You just wait!]

There are too many of us to worry about being persecuted for speaking truth right now. But we we must move fast. They are End Gaming.
Warning: Alex Jones avoids explicitly elucidating the Zionist/Jewish identity of this criminal mafia. Have a look at the Israeli lobby group documentaries I have below and then you'll see why he avoids it. That doesn't mean YOU avoid it. Alex Jones is doing his job. We must do ours. This is a united fight with a united goal - LIBERTY AND JUSTICE - but in order that we succeed there are many fronts coming in from every direction to hone down this criminal mass-murdering Zionist mafia.

Videos you must see about Zionists and their mafia evil

Watch all those videos there and you will see the lies of the so called Holocaust.

The War Party BBC Documentary

The Israel Lobby (AIPAC) - A Danger To The World

Peace, Propaganda and the Promised Land: Media & the Israel-Palestine Conflict

David Cole - The Truth Behind The Gates Of Auschwitz 1 of 2

Tuesday, January 1, 2008 and the naivity of Australians who care.

On Jan 1, 2008 10:33 PM, Hereward Fenton wrote:

"Sure. But its a fact that they are not genetically jews. It is a
religion, language, and culture and it must be smashed out of existence
finally. Most historians agree now that it was a big mistake going to war
against Hitler. We should have let him finish weeding out all the european

The above is one of your recent comments (3 weeks ago) on one of the 911oz
youtube videos.

It is because of comments like this (of which there have been many) that
you MUST be banned, and I MUST dissociate from you COMPLETELY.

That comment was made on YOUR video BEFORE you invited me back to the forum.

Secondly, you are never associated with my current opinions unless you currently state that you agree with them and quote them to support your own arguments - apparently moderators at 911oz, in this "quest for truth", have trouble understanding that they are not the reverend adjudicators of truth currency. There is not much room on YouTube Comments to make the precise statement of case. So here you are presented with the same statement, but to your satisfaction, unabridged:

I don't see anything anti-semitic or whatever in that statement judaism. The same nature of statements can be seen issued by Zionists all over the world press about Islam. Note what I say very carefully: It is a RELIGION AND CULTURE and it must be smashed out of existence finally. This implies that the "believers" are victims of a religious fraud. Judaism is one of the sickest religions I have ever read about. Only occult satanic churches would come close to it, my opinion.

With regard to historians seeing they were wrong to make war with Hitler - this is a historical fact known only to those who read:

With regard to the British conceding they made a big mistake opposing Hitler?

Sir Hartle Shawcross, Chief British Prosecutor at Nuremberg and later, British Attorney General, from a speech given at Stourbridge, England, on March 16, 1984:

"Step by step, I have arrived at the conviction that the aims of Communism in Europe are sinister and fatal. At the Nuremberg Trials, I, together with my Russian colleague, condemned Nazi Aggression and Terror. I believe now that Hitler and the German People did not want war. But we, {England}, declared war on Germany, intent on destroying it, in accordance with our principle of Balance of Power, and we were encouraged by the 'Americans'{Jews} around Roosevelt. We ignored Hitler's pleading, not to enter into war. Now we are forced to realize that Hitler was right. He offered us the co-operation of Germany: instead, since 1945, we have been facing the immense power of the Soviet Empire. I feel ashamed and humiliated to see that the aims we accused Hitler of, are being relentless pursued now, only under a different label." (Ashamed and Humiliated The British Attorney General, Sir Hartle Shawcross, said in a speech at Stourbridge, March 16, 1984 (AP)).

Notice this statement is heavily censored by Google.

UPDATE 11th September 2008
This above quote by Hartle Shawcross appears to be a bastardisation of the following original quote:

The Times (London ), March 13, 1948, p. 4, reports:

"SINISTER AIMS OF COMMUNISM SIR H. SHAWCROSS ON WESTERN UNION Sir Hartley Shawcross, the Attorney-General, speaking at Stourbridge last night [March 12th], said that recent tragic events in Czechoslovakia [communist putsch followed by suicide of Masaryk] had brought a new sense of urgency to the movement for western union. [...] SAME NAZI TECHNIQUE [...] Step by stepp I have been forced more and more to the conclusion that the aims of Communism in Europe are sinister and deadly aims. I prosecuted the Nazis in Nuremberg. With my Russian colleagues I condemned Nazi aggression and Nazi terror. I feel shame and humiliation now to see under a different name the same aims pursued, the same technique followed, without check. [...]"

This Times article does not claim to be based on an AP press release, nor does it contain the following sentences, sometimes quoted with other wording:

"I believe now that Hitler and the German People did not want war. But we declared war on Germany, intent on destryoing her. In this we were encouraged by the Jews around Roosevelt. This was said to be in accordance with our principle of the 'Balance of Power'. We ignored Hitler's pleading not to enter into war. Now we are forced to realize that Hitler was right. He offered us the co-operation of Germany. Instead, since 1945, we have been facing the immense power of the Soviet Empire."

Needless to say, it is apparently true that Hitler did not want war but was forced into it. If you even go read the Invasion of Poland entry at Wikipedia you will see how apparent that was in the geopolitics of August 1939.

END UPDATE 11th September 2008

Hitler didn't want war. The jews for 10 years attacked Hitler to no end of the earth - and in a similar way you witnessed "ME" refuse to relent his preposterous and cowardly slanderous campaign against my person. Just a sample:

"Hitler will have no war, but he will be forced into it, not this year but later..." (The Jewish Emil Ludwig, Les Annales, June, 1934)

"The millions of Jews who live in America, England and France, North and South Africa, and, not to forget those in Palestine, are determined to bring the war of annihilation against Germany to its final end." (The Jewish newspaper, Central Blad Voor Israeliten in Nederland, September 13, 1939)

(the funny thing about that Palestine reference is that even the Rabbi of Jerusalem vociferously opposed the Zionist occupation when finally they arrived in 1945. Just like the Zionist media won't let you know that the second largest population of jews in the middle-east, the Iranian jews, support Amadinejad and have refused Israel's repeated offers to pay them each 10s of thousands of dollars to emigrate to Israel)

One more:

"Kill the Germans, wherever you find them! Every German is our moral enemy. Have no mercy on women, children, or the aged! Kill every German -- wipe them out!" (Llya Ehrenburg, Glaser, p. 111).

Those Zionist jews are so nice. Unfortunately Hereward, although many jews disagree, at least 50% of them are Zionists alike. Another 40% are stupid. And the remainder are in opposition to Zionism.

Oh one more:

"Germany is the enemy of Judaism and must be pursued with deadly hatred. The goal of Judaism of today is: a merciless campaign against all German peoples and the complete destruction of the nation. We demand a complete blockade of trade, the importation of raw materials stopped, and retaliation towards every German, woman and child." (Jewish professor A. Kulischer, October, 1937)

Can't help myself. They are just so forgiving and merciful. Interesting Hereward isn't it that what the jews falsely accused the Nazis of pursuing is exactly what the jews intended for the germans? Remind you of someone of late? An anonymous poster called "ME"? Hereward you did see how he turned on you too? And viciousness, without mercy, were his threats against you.

This one is my favourite because it is just as relevant today as ever:

"Even if we Jews are not bodily with you in the trenches, we are nevertheless morally with you. This is OUR WAR, and you are fighting it for us." (Les Nouvelles Litteraires, February 10, 1940).

lol. You believe them don't you Hereward? They are with us morally if not physically. Kind of like "ME"'s public anonymity. You should out him if you know his real name.

The consequences of NOT opposing Zionism with all our might now will be of horrific proportions to make Iraq look like a traffic infringement. The Zionists want to nuke Iran and this will cause a full scale WW3 and many of us, you and me, will be killed, not to mention millions more innocent people in the middle-east.

I'm not going to try and awaken you to the meteorite heading for earth called Zionism.

Go have a look at comments on Ron Paul videos. As you know Ron Paul is, by a mile, the most popular candidate on the internet - that's because people with the internet do their research. Have a look and you will see that the way you have allowed 911oz to be moderated has left you in the shadows. Zionism is on the table now more than ever before and it is not going to relent. We know what is going on. We know who the mafia is. The facts stand for themselves to be counted and those with eyes are counting them.

Anyway Hereward, take your time. You are just one person and your journey of discovery is your own. Our fight to expose the facts in our possession will continue unabated. The internet is a big enough world for everybody.


Wednesday, December 19, 2007

This Article was Removed from 911oz - no one knows why!

Controlled Demolition Inc and Larry's "Pull" it

-- The 911oz Public Forum -- Forum Index -> 911oz Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
Joined: 19 May 2007
Posts: 229

PostPosted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 9:31 pm
Post subject: Controlled Demolition Inc and Larry's "Pull" it
Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post
"So they made the decision to *PULL* and then we watched the building come down" [Larry Silverstein]

Has anybody spent time reading Controlled Demolition Inc's website?

I searched for the term PULL to see how they use it--->

Only 4 cases of the word PULL on their website.

Notice in these first two instances the word PULL is bazaarly put in "quotation" marks.
Can anyone proffer why they would accentuate the word "pull" in such a context?

In the same paragraph they also put the term "kicker charges" in quotation marks. This suggests that these terms are vernaculars CD terminology. Kicking is a PUSHING word?

Here look at their use in this paragraph:

The preparation of the structure for implosion could have been approached a number of ways. Following in depth discussions with CABI’s selected preparation/debris removal contractor, NDA Member-Omega Contracting, Inc. of Pompano Beach, Florida, it was decided that CDI could effectively minimize the amount of linear shaped charge explosives to be used in the structure. By torch-cutting splice plates on selected upper columns/floors, and utilizing approximately 3,000 feet of steel-core cable on alternate upper floors to help “pull” the northern and eastern walls away from the fiber optics cables in NE Third Avenue and Biscayne Boulevard.

And again in next paragraph:

Utilizing a total of 137 pounds of linear shaped charges and 50 lbs of dynamite “kicker charges”, CDI worked in only the partial basement to the west, the Lobby Level and 4th floor of the structure. Placed in over 400 locations, the shaped charges were sequentially initiated over a period of 5.4 seconds, working from southwest to northeast through the structure. Following the seemingly endless 2.6 second natural pause in the non-electric initiation system, the structural charges detonated on cue, allowing the southwest wing of the structure to fail first, creating the desired lateral “pull” on the north and east curtain walls

Now, if its not a demolition term then why did they put it in inverted commas?

Insightful, the following two instances of their use of the word PULL is not enclosed in quotation marks and for one case they describe literally adding cables:

Strategically-placed ¾” cables were placed to pull the structure away from the A-1-A Bridge, adjacent to the west end of the structure, as well as away from the sea wall along Haulover Inlet on the north side of the site.

Now in the final and last case of the term PULL:

Small explosions fractured the rigid concrete allowing the structure to buckle and fall. The flexible rebar remained intact, acting like ropes to pull the columns toward the center.

Gravity did most of the work.

One thing I think we can agree on at least is that PULL is a demolition term and that it is used with quotation marks when they are using it as a term to describe the induced effect of well-placed and sequentially timed explosives, such as the implosion effect.

The whole argument here is that NIST deny that WTC7 was brought down in a controlled fashion. They posit that it collapsed without interference and that this symmetry of collapse was pure fluke of nature. Of course, NIST are yet to publish their report on this miracle as of May 2007.

Also, Popular Mechanics, which is seen as NIST's little propaganda helper, have also denied there is any reason to think that WTC7's collapse was controlled somehow and Popular Mechanics have gone further to deny that Larry Silverstein's comments "We made made the decision to PULL and then we watched the building collapse" is a reference to a decision to bring the building down deliberately. They deny this by incredibly claiming "that the demolition companies we spoke to have never heard of the term PULL before".

Incredibly, despite all the evidence to the contrary, including LIVE witness testimonies that they saw foundation explosions, heard thundering claps preceding the global collapse of the building, and that they were told by firemen that the building was going to be "brought down", was going to "Blow up" - also caught on LIVE video policemen and firemen saying it!! Incredibly, NIST and their public puppies Popular Mechanics, deny it.

This is why 9/11 Truthers refer to WTC7 collapse as the Smoking Gun. Because we have them in a corner, we have proof they are lying, and we can collect our evidence and records of NIST publicly LYING about these issues. Deny. Deflect. Defer.

These two video compilations will bring anyone up to speed on NIST and Popular Mechanics lies regarding WTC7:

NIST Denies Molten Metal at WTC

100% Evidence that Popular Mechanics are LIARS


Now believe it or not, many people on Youtube and other forums still defend NIST and Popular Mechanic's lies. It often seems that no matter how bloody and warm the evidence you slap them around with, they will never come to admit the fact that their government is LYING about 9/11!!!
Paid schills or miraculous denialism?


More on Controlled Demolition Inc

I think its valuable for people to read the following from CD Inc's website:

Sheikh A. Alakl Residential and Commercial Center
Jeddah, Saudia Arabia
Over the last 52 years, Controlled Demolition Incorporated has designed and used explosives to cause the controlled, progressive failure of thousands of brick, concrete and steel structures. It comes as no surprise that Controlled Demolition Incorporated’s database is highly useful in analyzing the condition of, and designing the implosion sequence for the demolition of structural systems damaged by construction failure, earthquakes, fires or explosions.

Half of the 17-story Sheikh A. Alakl Apartment Building in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia collapsed when portions of the new reinforced concrete facility were overloaded during final stages of construction. At the request of Bechtel, Controlled Demolition Incorporated’s team mobilized to the site in less than 24 hours, prepared the central-core, flat slab, reinforced concrete structure in another 27 hours and put the balance of the building on the ground with absolute safety just 96 hours after the start of demolition preparations. The "arm’s-length" nature of Controlled Demolition Incorporated’s operations, combined with our in-house engineering, rapid response capabilities and international network of resources make Controlled Demolition Incorporated the natural choice in dealing with structural emergencies, worldwide.

Colonia Roma
Mexico City, Mexico
After the 1985 earthquake, Controlled Demolition Incorporated (CDI) was called to Mexico City by the US Department of State to assist local authorities in the demolition of structures that were still standing despite severe structural damage. Controlled Demolition Incorporated’s in-house engineering capabilities and field analysis of the structural damage permits rapid demolition design. Minimal preparations required by Controlled Demolition Incorporated, combined with the stand-off nature of implosion activities makes Controlled Demolition Incorporated’s emergency response services the safest means of handling structures distressed by or rendered dynamic as a result of seismic events.

Controlled Demolition Incorporated's team managed over 400 employees of four Mexico City-based general contractors to prepare several structures for implosion simultaneously. Controlled Demolition Incorporated demolished 26 structures for the Mexican People, sometimes as many as 4 in 1 day in various parts of the shattered city. Working in the local language, Controlled Demolition Incorporated's team felled hanging structures that threatened rescue efforts, pulled leaning structures away from occupied buildings without a single injury to workers or contractors who supported our effort.

Alfred P. Murrah Federal Buildings
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Controlled Demolition Incorporated’s team coordinated with rescue and body retrieval efforts by authorities, salvaged evidence for the FBI’s investigation, prepared the building for implosion, and completed the demolition sequence in a continuous work program. Controlled Demolition Incorporated is equipped to work closely with governmental agencies under complex project scenarios that demand professionalism and attention to detail while working under difficult site, political and emotional conditions.

Cuneo Press Buildings
Chicago, Illinois
Under extreme political constraints and critical deadlines, Controlled Demolition Incorporated (CDI) was selected by the City of Chicago to work with a traditional demolition contractor to clear the site. In a fast track operation that involved the participation of a multitude of city agencies walking the edge of their specific mandates, Controlled Demolition Incorporated was able to prepare and fell the structures with absolute safety to adjacent interstate routes, rail lines, city streets and river retaining walls which were already vulnerable because of pre-existing damage.

But wait, there is more---->
Controlled Demolition Inc WORLD RECORDS

Seattle Kingdome
Seattle, Washington, USA
Record: The world's largest structure, by volume (19.821 million cu. m.), to be demolished by explosives.

J.L. Hudson Department Store
Detroit, Michigan, USA
Records: At 439 ft. tall Hudson’s is the tallest building & the tallest structural steel building ever imploded. At 2.2 million square feet, Hudson's is the largest single building ever imploded.

Villa Panamericana & Las Orquideas
San Juan, Puerto Rico
Record: The most buildings shot in a single implosion sequence.

Omega Radio Tower
Trelew, Argentina
Record: At 1201' 5", the tallest manmade structure ever felled with explosives.

But wait!!! There is even more:
Controlled Demolition Inc were subcontracted by Tully Construction at Ground Zero. And yet no mention of that work on their website???


The following is a hard to find article on the public internet. Lifted from the New York Law Journal during its publication month be submerging back under the private web domain:

By Sam Weisberg
New York Law Journal
October 4, 2006
Having outgrown its 400,000 square feet quarters at
99 Church Street, Moody's Corporation has agreed
to lease 15 floors, containing 600,000 square feet,
at 7 World Trade Center. The lease, the biggest so
far this year in Manhattan, is for 20 years and will
secure the 11th through 26th floors. All of Moody's
approximately 1,500 New York employees are
expected to relocate to the new premises by August
The new space will serve as headquarters for
Moody's, which has 2,900 employees in 22 countries
and revenues of about $1.7 billion. The offices and
conference rooms, still under construction, will be
used by financial analysts and other staff from the
parent corporation and from Moody's Investors
Service. Meanwhile, Moody's expected to put 99
Church Street on the market.
The 52-story tower 7 World Trade Center, formally known as 250 Greenwich Street, has been attracting a
wide range of tenants. The building has an advanced plumbing system that reduces water consumption by
30 percent; its lights dim according to the amount of natural sunlight; and its air conditioning units provide
more centralized and less expensive cooling ("Marketplace," NYLJ, Aug. 30). Moody's will share the building
with Darby & Darby, Ameriprise Financial, the publishing firm Mansuetto and the New York Academy of
Sciences. A little more than half the available space has been leased.
Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson partner Jonathan Mechanic and associates Michael J. Rhee
and Michael Gurary represented Moody's.
Wallace L. Schwartz, a partner at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, along with counsel Adam
M. Endick and associate Eleni Larcombe, represented landlord and building owner Silverstein Properties

Cushman & Wakefield vice president John Cefaly and executive vice president Gus Field were brokers for
Moody's along with Ed Donnery. Stephen B. Siegel and Simon Wasserberger of CB Richard Ellis served as
brokers for the landlord, as did Roger A. Silverstein of Silverstein Properties. Asking rents are $41.50 per
square foot.


I am going to post the original photocopy of this article up at because they allow attachments.

Last edited by Focoist on Wed Jul 04, 2007 5:18 am; edited 3 times in total

Tuesday, August 7, 2007

Zionist jews publish most mainstream media 9/11 Truth hit-pieces

The jews have everything to lose if the truth about 9/11 is fully exposed to the world. The jews will cease to sustain the support of the western armies currently engaged in unwinnable wars with the enemies of the jews.

All of these such hit-pieces are written almost to a template of feigned ignorance and strawman disregard.

The following is a critique of a perfect example of such an empty attack-piece by Australian traitor and zionist jew, Hugh Tobin:

Hugh Tobin works for an Australian neoconservative (Zionist) thinktank, Institute of Public Affairs (IPA).
Hugh Tobin is associate editor for IPA.
"Australia's Leading Free Market ThinkTank"
IPA in the News

"In Australia, neo-conservative views can be found in the pages of The Institute of Public Affairs at This site is interesting mainly for comment on Australian domestic issues, although recently prominent for their campaign on NGOs working in the international arena."

The Institute of Public Affairs is a right-wing, corporate funded think tank based in Melbourne. It has close links to the Liberal Party, with it's Executive Director John Roskam having run for Liberal preselection for a number of elections. Its key policy positions include advocacy for privatisation, deregulation, reduction in the power of unions and denial of most significant environmental problems, including climate change.

Hugh Tobin's Australian media 9/11 hit-piece article:

9-11 theories in overdrive
Hugh Tobin
The Geelong Advertiser
Thursday, March 29, 2007
IPA in the News

9-11 theories in overdrive
Hugh Tobin
The Geelong Advertiser
Thursday, March 29, 2007

Despite long and expensive inquiries, thousands of eye witnesses, and
conclusive video, sound and picture evidence, more than five years
after the attacks, sceptics continue to challenge every part of the
official story of what happened on 11 September 2001.

TOBIN, why don't you tell them about the 503 independent testimonies of explosives in the 9/11 Oral Histories? You know the ones which were
officially taken from all the fire-fighters and medical first-responders
in Nov 2001 but then suppressed by the city council until August 2005
when a Court of Appeals decision forced the Council to release them
and revealed to us what indeed the 9/11 Commission had covered up?

Here anyone who wants to know read these two accounts of the 503 independent testimonies of explosives suppressed by the media and the 9/11 Commission:
Professor David Ray Griffin and the other by Professor Graeme MacQueen:


And also you're familiar with MacQueens video lecture and article supporting Griffin's conclusions?
118 Witnesses: The Firefighter's Testimony to Explosions in the Twin
Prof. Graeme MacQueen

His video lecture:
9/11 Commission Report bars 503 1st responder eyewitnesses

I think there is a longer version?

501 almost qualifies for your claim to "thousands of witnesses" - witnesses to WHAT Hugh? Osama in a cave piloting 9/11? Jihadi mouth foaming arabs in all four planes ringing their tongues screaming Allahu Akbar as they slammed into 75% of their targets thus accomplishing a mission which IF you think about it sounds absurd from its outset? And where are the CCTV of these arabs boarding planes at the airports? (Just like the CCTV cameras in the Underground in London - Israeli security company lost all the footage?)

Imagine the Arab jihadi sitting in their caves after having just fought off some other wild cavemen trying to steal their women saying "Hey I have a plan - lets hijack planes and fly them into US targets and give those Neocons at Will Kristol's PNAC that New Pearl Harbour they been looking for". Second Arabs says "Yeh but what about NORAD? And why do you want to give Israel's America every reason they need to invade the middle-east and just take over all our gig?". Osama says ""Have faith in Allah". And then all the jihadi arabs agree "Allahu Akbar".

I mean, Tobin, this is Australia mate. We fight Crocs and shit. These jihadi, without sparing their own lives, could have more easily come to Australia and burnt it to the ground with a box of matches in the heat of summer. You expect us to believe that they so desperately wanted a hollywood extavaganza which would galvanise the American public to say "Lets turn the middle-east into a glass bowl" that they decided, all 20 of them, to die? We're not stupid in Australia Tobin. You HAVE heard of the killer koalas? Wait. Wait. Wait. I thought I'd finished. Rather than buy a Boeing 757 with all their money, Osama decided that it was a much better idea to send them to the US to train in pilot schools where the CIA and FBI would more easily be able to hold them under surveillance! Now go see Everybody Gotta Learn Sometime:

What about Prof. Terry Morrone?
Volume 10 - April 2007
Proof That The Thermal and Gravitational Energy Available Were Insufficient to Melt Steel in the Twin Towers and 7 World Trade Center on 9/11/01

Oh yes, sorry, you WERE going to mention the molten steel weren't you Hugh?

Oh yes, Hugh, how come you won't mention
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth in this article, and how there are now 137 (as of Hugh Tobin's article date - now there are 230!)
signatory structural engineers and architects who have all studied the
evidence and come to the same conclusion: The THREE WTC towers were
brought down with controlled demolition explosives.

Because maybe then, TOBIN you lying piece of shit, your audience might be INFORMED rather than led up the garden path by JUDAS?

photos, quotations taken out of context and confused eyewitness
accounts have inspired complex and often bizarre conspiracy theories.

Hey Tobin, why don't you tell them that NIST refuse to release any of
the thousands of photos and footage they boast privy?
Independent Investigators Release Suppressed Blueprints of Destroyed World Trade Center Tower

Further NIST refuse to fully disclose the source code of their "proof by computer simulation" models:

"Hoffman's associate editor, Gregg Roberts, sees the NIST Final Report as a whitewash. "The refusal by NIST to fully disclose its computer models, its assumptions, and the conflicts of interest of the many defense contractors who assisted in this whitewash of an investigation reveal the true intentions behind the Report."

And you know the 1000s of photos which FEMA commissioned Protec to collect? You know the ones that Blanchard of Protec boasted privy in his ImplosionWorld hitpiece? You know how Protec refuse to make them publically available?

Or hey, what about telling them how just a few months back BBC announced that they had accidently lost their ENTIRE 9/11 archive of footage?

Hey why
don't you tell them about the SOURCED NASA imagery which shows
temperatures in excess of possible from open combustion fires? Even John Gross the
Senior investigator for NIST was forced admit it:
Above url been deleted once again by YouTube.
Try this one:
Yes thats right Tobin, why don't you tell them about the pools of molten steel running "like lava" in the debris at Ground Zero?

Why don't you tell them that
half the families of the vicitms are calling for another investigation
because the 9/11 Commission didn't answer 70% of their questions???
50% of the victims families believe that 9/11 was an inside job!

Also Tobin, what kind of an investigative journalist are you if you're incapable of cross-verification of the sources? Its not hard.

Rather than a terrorist attack, on that day in 2001 the Pentagon was
in fact struck by a missile,

But that doesn't mean its NOT TERRORISM does it? Its still terrorism
whether it was a missile or whatever. Yes Tobin you know - its called
State-Sponsored terrorism. Whats wrong? Don't want your readers to have any revelations? Don't want them to know about the Irgun terrorists and the long documented history of Israeli state-sponsored false-flag terrorism?

Why don't you tell them about Norman Mineta's testimony to the 9/11
? You know the one that was censored out of the final
report? The one about the stand down of NORAD order.

the World Trade Centre buildings were
brought down by a controlled demolition,

Tell them about all the hundreds of structural engineers and
architects who have concluded this Tobin.

Flight 93 never actually

crashed, and some of the hijackers are still alive in Pakistan - a
logistical feat planned and executed by the US government using remote-
controlled planes.

Why don't you tell them about Pilots for 9/11 Truth who have proven
that the flight-recorder data doesn't show the plane hitting the

Why don't you tell them about the two Pentagon police officers who
testify that the flight path in the official report is not actually
the truth? That the plane didn't follow the path which is said to have
struck down the light poles?

There is a doco called Pentacon made by Pilots for 9/11 Truth. Its on Video-Google.

Anyone go and look up all the work Pilots for 9/11 Truth have done.

September 11 conspiracy theories generally fall into two categories.
Either US government agencies knew that the September 11 attacks were
going to occur and failed to act, or, alternatively, the government
was directly involved in planning and executing the attacks. A MIHOP
is, therefore, someone who believes that the government Made It Happen
On Purpose while a LIHOP believes the government Let It Happen On
Purpose. A large and growing number of people subscribe to these

Oh wow you spoke one paragraph of TRUTH. Well done. But don't forget
the prevailing theory held in the entire muslim world that it was
ISRAEL false-flag terrorism; the kind the muslim world are too well familiar with.And that the US government is controlled by the Neocons
who are predominatly Zionists

A poll taken by the Scripps Survey Research Centre in September 2006
found that 36 per cent of American respondents thought it was very
likely or somewhat likely that the government either took part in the
attacks or allowed them to happen. Meanwhile, 16 per cent thought the
destruction of the World Trade Centre was aided by explosives. Other
polls have reflected these results around the world.

Not going to mention the 60% of Muslims world wide who think it was
Israel poll?

A simple web search on September 11 conspiracy comes up with hundreds
of websites and groups devoted to the topic. Some are simple websites
set up by individuals but others are the work of complex organisations
such as The 9/11 Truth Movement which is a collection of individuals,
researchers and collections of people who are working together to
reveal the conspiracy.

Try 100,000 websites mate. Still lying about the size of this movement
are you?

Another group, known as the Scholars for 9/11 Truth, believes
September 11 was a psychological operation to launch somewhere from 50
to 100 years of aggressive warfare against Middle Eastern and Central
Asian countries. That the official account of 9/11 is a lie and that
9/11 appears to have been an inside job is no longer a matter of
serious scientific debate. Many of the experts used by the Scholars
and other conspiracy theorists to explain why it would be impossible
for the World Trade Centre to have collapsed the way it did, have very
little scientific training apart from watching a couple of cheaply-
produced videos on the Internet.

Scholars for 9/11 Truth was couped by disagents and thats why
Professor Steven Jones (physicist) and others abandoned it and set up
Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice, and also Journal of 9/11

Conspiracy theorists co-operate tightly, despite the contradictions
that may arise.

Not to mention the countless contradictions in the official fairy
tale? Of course you are going to get varying theories from a group of
decentralised independent researchers who are not privy to classified
documents. But you can not excuse the countless contradictions in the
OFFICIAL story can you?

Heres one: Rex Tomb the Chief of Publicity of the FBI admits in late 2006 that the reason the FBI hasn't indicted Osama for 9/11 is because they don't have any hard-evidence connecting Osama to 9/11!!!!!!


Why don't you tell them that hey Tobin?

One theorist who claims that a missile was fired into
the Pentagon will associate himself with another theorist who thinks
that a remotely controlled plane flew into the Pentagon.

Whats the difference? They are both remote controlled. They are both
used as missiles.
The firefighters weren't allowed into the Pentagon to extinguish the
fires. Only FBI were allowed into the Pentagon.

There is no footage of the plane hitting the Pentagon. No CCTV camera over the most defended and secured building in America?

In your beloved kook book by Popular Mechanics they claim that Flight 77's wings were sucked into the small hole made by the fuselage like a fluid - thats why there is no debris to be seen - the plane vapourised!!!


With every new video posted on YouTube, or book published, or website
launched, there arise new opportunities for the theorists to quote
each other and therefore claim to have overwhelming evidence of the
conspiracy. This has led to the popularity of videos such as Loose
Change, which had 10 million views in 2006 alone.

Ah, here it is!!!! He mentions the least credible 9/11 Truth
video on the internet - Loose Change. Try the 100 other videos of far
greater popularity and prestige you LYING schill.
The mainstream press has always been happy to promote Loose Change.

The producer of
Loose Change supposedly originally investigated the attacks to make a
fictional story about the attacks being an inside job, only to find
evidence that there was a real cover up: That 19 hijackers are going
to completely bypass security and crash four commercial airliners in a
span of two hours, with no interruption from the military forces, in
the most guarded airspace in the United States and the world? That to
me is a conspiracy theory.

Most of the September 11 theories are about as credible as a belief in
Nazis on the moon.

Yeh take it from a neocon who has everything to lose if 9/11 Truth becomes official truth. Whatever you do Geelong don't go and
have a look on for yourselves.

Here is a start:
911: Press For Truth
911 and the British Broadcasting Conspiracy
The Power of Nightmares (BBC)
Loose Change Final Cut
9/11 Mysteries
Video recorded University lectures from the aforementioned academics.

And although the theories are a form of
entertainment and fantasy for many people, it isn't just boredom
driving the conspiracy theory movement. Psychologists believe humans
are compelled to conspiracy theories, particularly for world-changing
events such as September 11. The authors of Debunking 9/11 Myths, a

most of them Zionists like you Tobin. And a book that has been
thoroughly debunked and exposed for the blatant lies and
misinformation it portends as accurate and correct.
Here for example just to show blatant lies being told by the authors
of that book:

comprehensive rebuttal published by the engineering magazine Popular
Mechanics, argue conspiracy theories share a basic thought pattern:
great tragedies must have great reasons.

especially if you need a "new Pearl Harbour" in order to catalyse the
Americans to support a global conquest in the middle-east to steal all
their oil? As written in your Zionist William Kristol thinktank PNAC, 2000 August
eh Tobin?

A conspiracy theorist will look at an event such as September 11 and
quickly conclude it is impossible for a small handful of terrorists to
inflict widespread death and destruction against the world's most
powerful nation.

Its NOT impossible for them. The death and destruction was not
widespread. 3000 deaths is nothing. Bush has already killed that many
US soldiers again by sending them to Iraq looking for WMDs he knew
weren't there.
EPA has already terminally injured 40,000 first-responder Ground Zero
workers by lying to them about the air-quality at the bequest of the
White House.

This is the point: The arabs would never be so insane to give
the Zionist jews of PNAC their freely available published in August 2000 fatwa against the muslims of the world - The
New Pearl Harbour. Sounds like a good plan does it? Give the jews Open
Season to get the Americans to go and invade the Middle-East? Good
plane is it Tobin? Those Muslims are crazy!! Tactically brilliant to be able to pull off 9/11 but strategically insane!!!

Conspiracy theorists then proceed to find supporting
evidence. At this point, science and conspiracy theory split.

But its not Conspiracy Theorists. Its world leaders, scientists,
former intellgience officials, US politicians, religious leaders, and
muslims world wide, engineers, architects, pilots. The
only people who believe the Official story are a small group of dazed
and confused western ignoramasses. So stop lying Tobin. Enough. You've
The Stringpullers
BBC War PArty

science makes an evaluation of the truth based on all the available
evidence, conspiracy theories generally look for evidence to support
conclusions that have already been established. Other evidence is
either ignored or discredited.

O.k. well you can't be talking about the 9/11 Truth Movement then:
9/11 Press For Truth - Victims' Families Tell the Story the Media Won't

For the conspiracy theory to gather a popular following, it needs to
explain elements of the story that the official account is unable to
explain easily to a lay person. In the case of 9/11, it was strange
the World Trade Centre building 7 also collapsed, despite not being
directly hit in the attacks.

NIST have been unable to explain the collapse of WTC7 to ANYONE let alone laymen. You lying dirtbag. NIST hasn't even published a report on its collapse and the 911CR didn't even mention it !!!

Stop lying Tobin. Stop misrepresentation the 9/11 Truth Movement. Most
of the kook theories out there are implanted as disinformation by your
friends at Mossad to try and obscure the TRUTH.

Bwahahahaha!!! Tobin we now know how you got your ass in an ostensibly prestigious "Wank Tank"!

Similarly, many find it strange that the Pentagon was so easily
attacked, and even more bizarre that not one of the planes was shot
down by the military. Many people also find it impossible to believe
that the World Trade Centre could fall in such a uniform fashion
without that being the result of a controlled demolition.

Or the Transport Secretary Norman Mineta's testimony that Dick Cheney
ordered a Stand Down of NORAD? For example - one of many.

Conspiracy theorists also often connect unrelated information and
sources. September 11 conspiracy theorists, for instance, claim the
World Trade Center buildings could not have collapsed because of a
plane impact as temperatures inside the building would not have been
high enough to melt metal. This is true but is disingenuous. Although
it is true steel's melting temperature is 1500C and that temperatures
in the World Trade Centre would not have likely exceeded 1100C, steel
heated to over 1000C softens and is reduced in strength to 10 per cent
of its room-temperature value.

Right. And what about the rest of the building that wasn't being
heated by fire? How do you explain the near free-fall progressive
collapes? All three buildings collapsed at the same speed they would
if using controlled demolition explosives. Why don't you tell everyone that in that big 10000 page report by NIST they didn't get time to investigate anything about the collapse after t=0 where the failure first begins?

On 9/11
we are expected to believe that laws of physics were defied? You know
those laws I studied at Melbourne University for THREE YEARS?
Seems like you're speaking out of place Tobin. Don't see a BSc next to
your name nor an engineering degree. You studied MEDIA AND

September 11 conspiracies all suffer from serious factual and logical
flaws. How could anyone have possibly prepared a controlled demolition
in the World Trade Centre without being noticed? Why would the
government go to so much trouble planning such a complex conspiracy
using foreign terrorists? Why were black-box recorders and bodies
found at the Pentagon if a 747 didn't crash there?

So basically you've just written the same paragraph 5 times in a row?
Nice one for a guy who got Bachelor of MEDIA and Communications at
Melbourne University. You're not even qualified to write an op-ed about this issue. Actually, you're disqualified.

September 11 is the most watched event in history and one of the most
important events of our lifetime.

Rather, 90% of the footage that was originally aired on 9/11 has never
been played again on the controlled mainstream media in our
country. Such as the collapse of WTC7 which predicatably Tobin doesn't
mention here because he's just hate for anyone in Geelong to go
look it up on the net wouldn't he?

Can everyone see how this article is designed to discourage you from
looking at the evidence for yourself? Tobin doesn't offer our best
punches for people to investigate themselves and he doesn't offer his humble
opinion but rather tries to state everything as though it is a given uncontested fact and pretend that the 9/11 Truth Movement is some fringe of uneducated
paranoid bored citizens. He doesn't mention one academic and only
points you to the Scholars for 9/11 Truth which everyone in the Truth
Movement knows is a disinformation site set up and infiltrated by the
same mafia who brought us 9/11.

The 9/11 Commission produced a 571-
page report that explains the events in full.

Is that so? care to mention Professor David Ray Griffin's critique
where he clearly lays out that 9/11 Commission was a fraud and a cover-

First: It wasn't INDEPENDENT:

It is a total fraud:
9/11 The Myth and the Reality: Dr. David Ray Griffin

90% of that audience are career academics Tobin you moron.
Its TREASON Tobin. And if you cover it up you should be locked up for life as well.

The National Institute
of Standards and Technology also produced 10,000 pages of evidenceon
how and why the World Trade Centre buildings collapsed the way they
did. It could find no corroborating evidence for alternative


hypotheses suggesting the WTC towers were brought down by controlled
demolition using explosives planted prior to September 11, 2001.
Certainly there is strong evidence to suggest there were serious
errors made by the Bush and Clinton administrations in the lead-up to
the September 11 attacks. But suggestions that the United States
Government, or aliens, or the X-Files' Cigarette Smoking Man were
involved in the tragic events of our past have little basis in reality
even though they might feed some deep-seated psychological need for
operatic complexity.